Review



cck1r  (Santa Cruz Biotechnology)


Bioz Verified Symbol Santa Cruz Biotechnology is a verified supplier  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 94
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    Santa Cruz Biotechnology cck1r
    (A) Schematic of METH CPP procedure. (B) The expression of <t>CCK1R</t> mRNA. n = 5 mice. (C) The expression of CCK2R mRNA. BLA: Unpaired t test, t = 4.180, P = 0.0031, n = 5 mice. (D) The expression of CCKR mRNA in BLA after METH training. n = 5 mice. (E) Top: Representative immunoblots of CCK1R. Bottom: Relative amounts of CCK1R quantified by densitometry, in BLA. Unpaired t test, t = 0.317, P = 0.759, n = 5 mice. (F) Top: Representative immunoblots of CCK2R. Bottom: Relative amounts of CCK2R quantified by densitometry, in BLA. Unpaired t test, t = 2.620, P = 0.031, n = 5 mice. (G) Schematic of METH CPP procedure. (H) Schematic diagram of virus injection in BLA. Scale bar=200μm . (I, J) Heat map and score bar chart of METH CPP. Two-way RM ANOVA, F treatment (3,44) = 21.94, P <0.001; Tukey’s post hoc comparison, CCK2R-KO + METH vs Vector+METH: P <0.001, n = 12 mice. (K, L) In vitro electrophysiology: AP spiking patterns evoked by 400 pA current injections and spike numbers and thresholds for AP firing. Two-way RM ANOVA ANOVA, F treatment (3,44) = 31.20, P <0.001; Tukey’s post hoc comparison, Vector+Saline vs Vector+METH: P <0.001, CCK2R-KO + METH vs Vector+METH: P <0.001, n = 12 cells from 4 mice. (M, N) In vivo electrophysiology: AP spiking patterns and bar chart of AP frequency. Ordinary one-way ANOVA, F treatment (3,44) = 12.32, P <0.001; Tukey’s post hoc comparison, Vector+Saline vs Vector+METH: P <0.001, CCK2R-KO + METH vs Vector+METH: P <0.001, n = 12 cells from 3 mice. All data are means ± SEM, * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001.
    Cck1r, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 24 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/cck1r/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
    Average 94 stars, based on 24 article reviews
    cck1r - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    94/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "CCK2R regulates METH-induced CPP acquisition within VTA-BLA-BNST circuit in male mice"

    Article Title: CCK2R regulates METH-induced CPP acquisition within VTA-BLA-BNST circuit in male mice

    Journal: Translational Psychiatry

    doi: 10.1038/s41398-026-03982-y

    (A) Schematic of METH CPP procedure. (B) The expression of CCK1R mRNA. n = 5 mice. (C) The expression of CCK2R mRNA. BLA: Unpaired t test, t = 4.180, P = 0.0031, n = 5 mice. (D) The expression of CCKR mRNA in BLA after METH training. n = 5 mice. (E) Top: Representative immunoblots of CCK1R. Bottom: Relative amounts of CCK1R quantified by densitometry, in BLA. Unpaired t test, t = 0.317, P = 0.759, n = 5 mice. (F) Top: Representative immunoblots of CCK2R. Bottom: Relative amounts of CCK2R quantified by densitometry, in BLA. Unpaired t test, t = 2.620, P = 0.031, n = 5 mice. (G) Schematic of METH CPP procedure. (H) Schematic diagram of virus injection in BLA. Scale bar=200μm . (I, J) Heat map and score bar chart of METH CPP. Two-way RM ANOVA, F treatment (3,44) = 21.94, P <0.001; Tukey’s post hoc comparison, CCK2R-KO + METH vs Vector+METH: P <0.001, n = 12 mice. (K, L) In vitro electrophysiology: AP spiking patterns evoked by 400 pA current injections and spike numbers and thresholds for AP firing. Two-way RM ANOVA ANOVA, F treatment (3,44) = 31.20, P <0.001; Tukey’s post hoc comparison, Vector+Saline vs Vector+METH: P <0.001, CCK2R-KO + METH vs Vector+METH: P <0.001, n = 12 cells from 4 mice. (M, N) In vivo electrophysiology: AP spiking patterns and bar chart of AP frequency. Ordinary one-way ANOVA, F treatment (3,44) = 12.32, P <0.001; Tukey’s post hoc comparison, Vector+Saline vs Vector+METH: P <0.001, CCK2R-KO + METH vs Vector+METH: P <0.001, n = 12 cells from 3 mice. All data are means ± SEM, * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001.
    Figure Legend Snippet: (A) Schematic of METH CPP procedure. (B) The expression of CCK1R mRNA. n = 5 mice. (C) The expression of CCK2R mRNA. BLA: Unpaired t test, t = 4.180, P = 0.0031, n = 5 mice. (D) The expression of CCKR mRNA in BLA after METH training. n = 5 mice. (E) Top: Representative immunoblots of CCK1R. Bottom: Relative amounts of CCK1R quantified by densitometry, in BLA. Unpaired t test, t = 0.317, P = 0.759, n = 5 mice. (F) Top: Representative immunoblots of CCK2R. Bottom: Relative amounts of CCK2R quantified by densitometry, in BLA. Unpaired t test, t = 2.620, P = 0.031, n = 5 mice. (G) Schematic of METH CPP procedure. (H) Schematic diagram of virus injection in BLA. Scale bar=200μm . (I, J) Heat map and score bar chart of METH CPP. Two-way RM ANOVA, F treatment (3,44) = 21.94, P <0.001; Tukey’s post hoc comparison, CCK2R-KO + METH vs Vector+METH: P <0.001, n = 12 mice. (K, L) In vitro electrophysiology: AP spiking patterns evoked by 400 pA current injections and spike numbers and thresholds for AP firing. Two-way RM ANOVA ANOVA, F treatment (3,44) = 31.20, P <0.001; Tukey’s post hoc comparison, Vector+Saline vs Vector+METH: P <0.001, CCK2R-KO + METH vs Vector+METH: P <0.001, n = 12 cells from 4 mice. (M, N) In vivo electrophysiology: AP spiking patterns and bar chart of AP frequency. Ordinary one-way ANOVA, F treatment (3,44) = 12.32, P <0.001; Tukey’s post hoc comparison, Vector+Saline vs Vector+METH: P <0.001, CCK2R-KO + METH vs Vector+METH: P <0.001, n = 12 cells from 3 mice. All data are means ± SEM, * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001.

    Techniques Used: Expressing, Western Blot, Virus, Injection, Comparison, Plasmid Preparation, In Vitro, Saline, In Vivo



    Similar Products

    cck1r  (Santa Cruz Biotechnology)
    94
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology cck1r
    (A) Schematic of METH CPP procedure. (B) The expression of <t>CCK1R</t> mRNA. n = 5 mice. (C) The expression of CCK2R mRNA. BLA: Unpaired t test, t = 4.180, P = 0.0031, n = 5 mice. (D) The expression of CCKR mRNA in BLA after METH training. n = 5 mice. (E) Top: Representative immunoblots of CCK1R. Bottom: Relative amounts of CCK1R quantified by densitometry, in BLA. Unpaired t test, t = 0.317, P = 0.759, n = 5 mice. (F) Top: Representative immunoblots of CCK2R. Bottom: Relative amounts of CCK2R quantified by densitometry, in BLA. Unpaired t test, t = 2.620, P = 0.031, n = 5 mice. (G) Schematic of METH CPP procedure. (H) Schematic diagram of virus injection in BLA. Scale bar=200μm . (I, J) Heat map and score bar chart of METH CPP. Two-way RM ANOVA, F treatment (3,44) = 21.94, P <0.001; Tukey’s post hoc comparison, CCK2R-KO + METH vs Vector+METH: P <0.001, n = 12 mice. (K, L) In vitro electrophysiology: AP spiking patterns evoked by 400 pA current injections and spike numbers and thresholds for AP firing. Two-way RM ANOVA ANOVA, F treatment (3,44) = 31.20, P <0.001; Tukey’s post hoc comparison, Vector+Saline vs Vector+METH: P <0.001, CCK2R-KO + METH vs Vector+METH: P <0.001, n = 12 cells from 4 mice. (M, N) In vivo electrophysiology: AP spiking patterns and bar chart of AP frequency. Ordinary one-way ANOVA, F treatment (3,44) = 12.32, P <0.001; Tukey’s post hoc comparison, Vector+Saline vs Vector+METH: P <0.001, CCK2R-KO + METH vs Vector+METH: P <0.001, n = 12 cells from 3 mice. All data are means ± SEM, * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001.
    Cck1r, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/cck1r/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cck1r - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    94/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    mouse  (Santa Cruz Biotechnology)
    94
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology mouse
    (A) Schematic of METH CPP procedure. (B) The expression of <t>CCK1R</t> mRNA. n = 5 mice. (C) The expression of CCK2R mRNA. BLA: Unpaired t test, t = 4.180, P = 0.0031, n = 5 mice. (D) The expression of CCKR mRNA in BLA after METH training. n = 5 mice. (E) Top: Representative immunoblots of CCK1R. Bottom: Relative amounts of CCK1R quantified by densitometry, in BLA. Unpaired t test, t = 0.317, P = 0.759, n = 5 mice. (F) Top: Representative immunoblots of CCK2R. Bottom: Relative amounts of CCK2R quantified by densitometry, in BLA. Unpaired t test, t = 2.620, P = 0.031, n = 5 mice. (G) Schematic of METH CPP procedure. (H) Schematic diagram of virus injection in BLA. Scale bar=200μm . (I, J) Heat map and score bar chart of METH CPP. Two-way RM ANOVA, F treatment (3,44) = 21.94, P <0.001; Tukey’s post hoc comparison, CCK2R-KO + METH vs Vector+METH: P <0.001, n = 12 mice. (K, L) In vitro electrophysiology: AP spiking patterns evoked by 400 pA current injections and spike numbers and thresholds for AP firing. Two-way RM ANOVA ANOVA, F treatment (3,44) = 31.20, P <0.001; Tukey’s post hoc comparison, Vector+Saline vs Vector+METH: P <0.001, CCK2R-KO + METH vs Vector+METH: P <0.001, n = 12 cells from 4 mice. (M, N) In vivo electrophysiology: AP spiking patterns and bar chart of AP frequency. Ordinary one-way ANOVA, F treatment (3,44) = 12.32, P <0.001; Tukey’s post hoc comparison, Vector+Saline vs Vector+METH: P <0.001, CCK2R-KO + METH vs Vector+METH: P <0.001, n = 12 cells from 3 mice. All data are means ± SEM, * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001.
    Mouse, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    94/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    cck ar  (Santa Cruz Biotechnology)
    94
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology cck ar
    (A) Schematic of METH CPP procedure. (B) The expression of <t>CCK1R</t> mRNA. n = 5 mice. (C) The expression of CCK2R mRNA. BLA: Unpaired t test, t = 4.180, P = 0.0031, n = 5 mice. (D) The expression of CCKR mRNA in BLA after METH training. n = 5 mice. (E) Top: Representative immunoblots of CCK1R. Bottom: Relative amounts of CCK1R quantified by densitometry, in BLA. Unpaired t test, t = 0.317, P = 0.759, n = 5 mice. (F) Top: Representative immunoblots of CCK2R. Bottom: Relative amounts of CCK2R quantified by densitometry, in BLA. Unpaired t test, t = 2.620, P = 0.031, n = 5 mice. (G) Schematic of METH CPP procedure. (H) Schematic diagram of virus injection in BLA. Scale bar=200μm . (I, J) Heat map and score bar chart of METH CPP. Two-way RM ANOVA, F treatment (3,44) = 21.94, P <0.001; Tukey’s post hoc comparison, CCK2R-KO + METH vs Vector+METH: P <0.001, n = 12 mice. (K, L) In vitro electrophysiology: AP spiking patterns evoked by 400 pA current injections and spike numbers and thresholds for AP firing. Two-way RM ANOVA ANOVA, F treatment (3,44) = 31.20, P <0.001; Tukey’s post hoc comparison, Vector+Saline vs Vector+METH: P <0.001, CCK2R-KO + METH vs Vector+METH: P <0.001, n = 12 cells from 4 mice. (M, N) In vivo electrophysiology: AP spiking patterns and bar chart of AP frequency. Ordinary one-way ANOVA, F treatment (3,44) = 12.32, P <0.001; Tukey’s post hoc comparison, Vector+Saline vs Vector+METH: P <0.001, CCK2R-KO + METH vs Vector+METH: P <0.001, n = 12 cells from 3 mice. All data are means ± SEM, * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001.
    Cck Ar, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/cck ar/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cck ar - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    94/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    cck antibody  (Santa Cruz Biotechnology)
    94
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology cck antibody
    (A) Schematic of METH CPP procedure. (B) The expression of <t>CCK1R</t> mRNA. n = 5 mice. (C) The expression of CCK2R mRNA. BLA: Unpaired t test, t = 4.180, P = 0.0031, n = 5 mice. (D) The expression of CCKR mRNA in BLA after METH training. n = 5 mice. (E) Top: Representative immunoblots of CCK1R. Bottom: Relative amounts of CCK1R quantified by densitometry, in BLA. Unpaired t test, t = 0.317, P = 0.759, n = 5 mice. (F) Top: Representative immunoblots of CCK2R. Bottom: Relative amounts of CCK2R quantified by densitometry, in BLA. Unpaired t test, t = 2.620, P = 0.031, n = 5 mice. (G) Schematic of METH CPP procedure. (H) Schematic diagram of virus injection in BLA. Scale bar=200μm . (I, J) Heat map and score bar chart of METH CPP. Two-way RM ANOVA, F treatment (3,44) = 21.94, P <0.001; Tukey’s post hoc comparison, CCK2R-KO + METH vs Vector+METH: P <0.001, n = 12 mice. (K, L) In vitro electrophysiology: AP spiking patterns evoked by 400 pA current injections and spike numbers and thresholds for AP firing. Two-way RM ANOVA ANOVA, F treatment (3,44) = 31.20, P <0.001; Tukey’s post hoc comparison, Vector+Saline vs Vector+METH: P <0.001, CCK2R-KO + METH vs Vector+METH: P <0.001, n = 12 cells from 4 mice. (M, N) In vivo electrophysiology: AP spiking patterns and bar chart of AP frequency. Ordinary one-way ANOVA, F treatment (3,44) = 12.32, P <0.001; Tukey’s post hoc comparison, Vector+Saline vs Vector+METH: P <0.001, CCK2R-KO + METH vs Vector+METH: P <0.001, n = 12 cells from 3 mice. All data are means ± SEM, * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001.
    Cck Antibody, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/cck antibody/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    cck antibody - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    94/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    mouse polyclonal cck2r  (Santa Cruz Biotechnology)
    94
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology mouse polyclonal cck2r
    (A) Schematic of METH CPP procedure. (B) The expression of <t>CCK1R</t> mRNA. n = 5 mice. (C) The expression of CCK2R mRNA. BLA: Unpaired t test, t = 4.180, P = 0.0031, n = 5 mice. (D) The expression of CCKR mRNA in BLA after METH training. n = 5 mice. (E) Top: Representative immunoblots of CCK1R. Bottom: Relative amounts of CCK1R quantified by densitometry, in BLA. Unpaired t test, t = 0.317, P = 0.759, n = 5 mice. (F) Top: Representative immunoblots of CCK2R. Bottom: Relative amounts of CCK2R quantified by densitometry, in BLA. Unpaired t test, t = 2.620, P = 0.031, n = 5 mice. (G) Schematic of METH CPP procedure. (H) Schematic diagram of virus injection in BLA. Scale bar=200μm . (I, J) Heat map and score bar chart of METH CPP. Two-way RM ANOVA, F treatment (3,44) = 21.94, P <0.001; Tukey’s post hoc comparison, CCK2R-KO + METH vs Vector+METH: P <0.001, n = 12 mice. (K, L) In vitro electrophysiology: AP spiking patterns evoked by 400 pA current injections and spike numbers and thresholds for AP firing. Two-way RM ANOVA ANOVA, F treatment (3,44) = 31.20, P <0.001; Tukey’s post hoc comparison, Vector+Saline vs Vector+METH: P <0.001, CCK2R-KO + METH vs Vector+METH: P <0.001, n = 12 cells from 4 mice. (M, N) In vivo electrophysiology: AP spiking patterns and bar chart of AP frequency. Ordinary one-way ANOVA, F treatment (3,44) = 12.32, P <0.001; Tukey’s post hoc comparison, Vector+Saline vs Vector+METH: P <0.001, CCK2R-KO + METH vs Vector+METH: P <0.001, n = 12 cells from 3 mice. All data are means ± SEM, * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001.
    Mouse Polyclonal Cck2r, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/mouse polyclonal cck2r/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    mouse polyclonal cck2r - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    94/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    antibody anti cck1 receptor  (Santa Cruz Biotechnology)
    94
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology antibody anti cck1 receptor
    (A) Schematic of METH CPP procedure. (B) The expression of <t>CCK1R</t> mRNA. n = 5 mice. (C) The expression of CCK2R mRNA. BLA: Unpaired t test, t = 4.180, P = 0.0031, n = 5 mice. (D) The expression of CCKR mRNA in BLA after METH training. n = 5 mice. (E) Top: Representative immunoblots of CCK1R. Bottom: Relative amounts of CCK1R quantified by densitometry, in BLA. Unpaired t test, t = 0.317, P = 0.759, n = 5 mice. (F) Top: Representative immunoblots of CCK2R. Bottom: Relative amounts of CCK2R quantified by densitometry, in BLA. Unpaired t test, t = 2.620, P = 0.031, n = 5 mice. (G) Schematic of METH CPP procedure. (H) Schematic diagram of virus injection in BLA. Scale bar=200μm . (I, J) Heat map and score bar chart of METH CPP. Two-way RM ANOVA, F treatment (3,44) = 21.94, P <0.001; Tukey’s post hoc comparison, CCK2R-KO + METH vs Vector+METH: P <0.001, n = 12 mice. (K, L) In vitro electrophysiology: AP spiking patterns evoked by 400 pA current injections and spike numbers and thresholds for AP firing. Two-way RM ANOVA ANOVA, F treatment (3,44) = 31.20, P <0.001; Tukey’s post hoc comparison, Vector+Saline vs Vector+METH: P <0.001, CCK2R-KO + METH vs Vector+METH: P <0.001, n = 12 cells from 4 mice. (M, N) In vivo electrophysiology: AP spiking patterns and bar chart of AP frequency. Ordinary one-way ANOVA, F treatment (3,44) = 12.32, P <0.001; Tukey’s post hoc comparison, Vector+Saline vs Vector+METH: P <0.001, CCK2R-KO + METH vs Vector+METH: P <0.001, n = 12 cells from 3 mice. All data are means ± SEM, * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001.
    Antibody Anti Cck1 Receptor, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/antibody anti cck1 receptor/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    antibody anti cck1 receptor - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    94/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    anti cholecystokinin  (Santa Cruz Biotechnology)
    94
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology anti cholecystokinin
    (A) Schematic of METH CPP procedure. (B) The expression of <t>CCK1R</t> mRNA. n = 5 mice. (C) The expression of CCK2R mRNA. BLA: Unpaired t test, t = 4.180, P = 0.0031, n = 5 mice. (D) The expression of CCKR mRNA in BLA after METH training. n = 5 mice. (E) Top: Representative immunoblots of CCK1R. Bottom: Relative amounts of CCK1R quantified by densitometry, in BLA. Unpaired t test, t = 0.317, P = 0.759, n = 5 mice. (F) Top: Representative immunoblots of CCK2R. Bottom: Relative amounts of CCK2R quantified by densitometry, in BLA. Unpaired t test, t = 2.620, P = 0.031, n = 5 mice. (G) Schematic of METH CPP procedure. (H) Schematic diagram of virus injection in BLA. Scale bar=200μm . (I, J) Heat map and score bar chart of METH CPP. Two-way RM ANOVA, F treatment (3,44) = 21.94, P <0.001; Tukey’s post hoc comparison, CCK2R-KO + METH vs Vector+METH: P <0.001, n = 12 mice. (K, L) In vitro electrophysiology: AP spiking patterns evoked by 400 pA current injections and spike numbers and thresholds for AP firing. Two-way RM ANOVA ANOVA, F treatment (3,44) = 31.20, P <0.001; Tukey’s post hoc comparison, Vector+Saline vs Vector+METH: P <0.001, CCK2R-KO + METH vs Vector+METH: P <0.001, n = 12 cells from 4 mice. (M, N) In vivo electrophysiology: AP spiking patterns and bar chart of AP frequency. Ordinary one-way ANOVA, F treatment (3,44) = 12.32, P <0.001; Tukey’s post hoc comparison, Vector+Saline vs Vector+METH: P <0.001, CCK2R-KO + METH vs Vector+METH: P <0.001, n = 12 cells from 3 mice. All data are means ± SEM, * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001.
    Anti Cholecystokinin, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/anti cholecystokinin/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    anti cholecystokinin - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    94/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier
    primary antibody cck1r  (Santa Cruz Biotechnology)
    94
    Santa Cruz Biotechnology primary antibody cck1r
    (A) Schematic of METH CPP procedure. (B) The expression of <t>CCK1R</t> mRNA. n = 5 mice. (C) The expression of CCK2R mRNA. BLA: Unpaired t test, t = 4.180, P = 0.0031, n = 5 mice. (D) The expression of CCKR mRNA in BLA after METH training. n = 5 mice. (E) Top: Representative immunoblots of CCK1R. Bottom: Relative amounts of CCK1R quantified by densitometry, in BLA. Unpaired t test, t = 0.317, P = 0.759, n = 5 mice. (F) Top: Representative immunoblots of CCK2R. Bottom: Relative amounts of CCK2R quantified by densitometry, in BLA. Unpaired t test, t = 2.620, P = 0.031, n = 5 mice. (G) Schematic of METH CPP procedure. (H) Schematic diagram of virus injection in BLA. Scale bar=200μm . (I, J) Heat map and score bar chart of METH CPP. Two-way RM ANOVA, F treatment (3,44) = 21.94, P <0.001; Tukey’s post hoc comparison, CCK2R-KO + METH vs Vector+METH: P <0.001, n = 12 mice. (K, L) In vitro electrophysiology: AP spiking patterns evoked by 400 pA current injections and spike numbers and thresholds for AP firing. Two-way RM ANOVA ANOVA, F treatment (3,44) = 31.20, P <0.001; Tukey’s post hoc comparison, Vector+Saline vs Vector+METH: P <0.001, CCK2R-KO + METH vs Vector+METH: P <0.001, n = 12 cells from 4 mice. (M, N) In vivo electrophysiology: AP spiking patterns and bar chart of AP frequency. Ordinary one-way ANOVA, F treatment (3,44) = 12.32, P <0.001; Tukey’s post hoc comparison, Vector+Saline vs Vector+METH: P <0.001, CCK2R-KO + METH vs Vector+METH: P <0.001, n = 12 cells from 3 mice. All data are means ± SEM, * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001.
    Primary Antibody Cck1r, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 94/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/primary antibody cck1r/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
    Average 94 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    primary antibody cck1r - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    94/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    (A) Schematic of METH CPP procedure. (B) The expression of CCK1R mRNA. n = 5 mice. (C) The expression of CCK2R mRNA. BLA: Unpaired t test, t = 4.180, P = 0.0031, n = 5 mice. (D) The expression of CCKR mRNA in BLA after METH training. n = 5 mice. (E) Top: Representative immunoblots of CCK1R. Bottom: Relative amounts of CCK1R quantified by densitometry, in BLA. Unpaired t test, t = 0.317, P = 0.759, n = 5 mice. (F) Top: Representative immunoblots of CCK2R. Bottom: Relative amounts of CCK2R quantified by densitometry, in BLA. Unpaired t test, t = 2.620, P = 0.031, n = 5 mice. (G) Schematic of METH CPP procedure. (H) Schematic diagram of virus injection in BLA. Scale bar=200μm . (I, J) Heat map and score bar chart of METH CPP. Two-way RM ANOVA, F treatment (3,44) = 21.94, P <0.001; Tukey’s post hoc comparison, CCK2R-KO + METH vs Vector+METH: P <0.001, n = 12 mice. (K, L) In vitro electrophysiology: AP spiking patterns evoked by 400 pA current injections and spike numbers and thresholds for AP firing. Two-way RM ANOVA ANOVA, F treatment (3,44) = 31.20, P <0.001; Tukey’s post hoc comparison, Vector+Saline vs Vector+METH: P <0.001, CCK2R-KO + METH vs Vector+METH: P <0.001, n = 12 cells from 4 mice. (M, N) In vivo electrophysiology: AP spiking patterns and bar chart of AP frequency. Ordinary one-way ANOVA, F treatment (3,44) = 12.32, P <0.001; Tukey’s post hoc comparison, Vector+Saline vs Vector+METH: P <0.001, CCK2R-KO + METH vs Vector+METH: P <0.001, n = 12 cells from 3 mice. All data are means ± SEM, * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001.

    Journal: Translational Psychiatry

    Article Title: CCK2R regulates METH-induced CPP acquisition within VTA-BLA-BNST circuit in male mice

    doi: 10.1038/s41398-026-03982-y

    Figure Lengend Snippet: (A) Schematic of METH CPP procedure. (B) The expression of CCK1R mRNA. n = 5 mice. (C) The expression of CCK2R mRNA. BLA: Unpaired t test, t = 4.180, P = 0.0031, n = 5 mice. (D) The expression of CCKR mRNA in BLA after METH training. n = 5 mice. (E) Top: Representative immunoblots of CCK1R. Bottom: Relative amounts of CCK1R quantified by densitometry, in BLA. Unpaired t test, t = 0.317, P = 0.759, n = 5 mice. (F) Top: Representative immunoblots of CCK2R. Bottom: Relative amounts of CCK2R quantified by densitometry, in BLA. Unpaired t test, t = 2.620, P = 0.031, n = 5 mice. (G) Schematic of METH CPP procedure. (H) Schematic diagram of virus injection in BLA. Scale bar=200μm . (I, J) Heat map and score bar chart of METH CPP. Two-way RM ANOVA, F treatment (3,44) = 21.94, P <0.001; Tukey’s post hoc comparison, CCK2R-KO + METH vs Vector+METH: P <0.001, n = 12 mice. (K, L) In vitro electrophysiology: AP spiking patterns evoked by 400 pA current injections and spike numbers and thresholds for AP firing. Two-way RM ANOVA ANOVA, F treatment (3,44) = 31.20, P <0.001; Tukey’s post hoc comparison, Vector+Saline vs Vector+METH: P <0.001, CCK2R-KO + METH vs Vector+METH: P <0.001, n = 12 cells from 4 mice. (M, N) In vivo electrophysiology: AP spiking patterns and bar chart of AP frequency. Ordinary one-way ANOVA, F treatment (3,44) = 12.32, P <0.001; Tukey’s post hoc comparison, Vector+Saline vs Vector+METH: P <0.001, CCK2R-KO + METH vs Vector+METH: P <0.001, n = 12 cells from 3 mice. All data are means ± SEM, * P < 0.05; ** P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001.

    Article Snippet: Membranes were then blocked for 1 h using 5% skim milk in TBS before overnight incubation at 4 °C with primary antibodies: mouse GAPDH (1:10,000 dilution, ABclonal, AC033), CCK1R (1:150, Santa Cruz, sc-514303) or CCK2R (1:150, Santa Cruz, sc-166690).

    Techniques: Expressing, Western Blot, Virus, Injection, Comparison, Plasmid Preparation, In Vitro, Saline, In Vivo